Search Results for "deficit amount"

774 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 774 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Following Precedent in Cognate Appeals. Appellants entitled to same compensation of Rs.81.05/- per sq.mtr. as granted in earlier appeals for same village acquisition under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The present first appeal was filed by the appellants under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Agreement of Sale in Specific Performance Suit. Notarised Agreement of Sale Not an Instrument Chargeable with Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners (defendants in the suit) challenged a common order dated 22/8/2019 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Pune in Special Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Against DRT Order for Lack of Locus Standi — Petitioner Not a Borrower or Guarantor Under SARFAESI Act. Third Party Claiming Title Through Decree for Specific Performance Cannot Challenge DRT Proceedings.

The petitioner, K.L. Kumaraswamy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated 21.08....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...