Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal in Property Dispute among Legal Heirs under Section 100 CPC. First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree Questioned on Substantial Questions of Law.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "cautious filing"
362 result(s) found
Found 362 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Tempo Driver Upheld, Income of Deceased Reassessed at Rs.7,500 per Month. The Court applied principles of future prospects and multiplier as per Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma, enhancing compensation from Rs.6,37,200 to Rs.13,76,600.
25 Mar 2026The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the original claimants (appellants) being aggrieved by the judgment...
- 131
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.
12 Jan 2024The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...
- 336
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship Over 10 Years. Long-Standing Relationship Without Complaint Indicates Consent, Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Mahesh Damu Khare against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dismissed his petition under Sect...
- 1382
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in Property Declaration Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. Court holds that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the plaintiff's claim is based on a different title and the earlier decree is challenged as not binding.
23 Jun 2023The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the petitioner (defendant No.1 in the original suit) challenging the order dated 02.06.2022 pa...
- 118
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused as Signature on Cheque Admitted and Statutory Notice Complied With.
29 Mar 2023The appellant, M/s. Indian Potash Limited, a company engaged in importing and marketing fertilizers, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Mother-in-law and Sister-in-law in Dowry Harassment Case — Allegations Found Vague and Lacking Specificity. Court holds that general and omnibus allegations against relatives of husband without specific instances of cruelty or demand for dowry do not constitute offence under Section 498A IPC.
10 Nov 2021The petitioners, who are the mother-in-law (accused No.2) and sister-in-law (accused No.3) of the complainant, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC...
- 189
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
16 Jul 2021The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...
- 151
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.
1 Aug 2018The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree for Husband in Mohomedan Law Case — Wife’s Cruelty Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Wife Failed to Prove Cruelty Under Section 281(2) of Mohomedan Law to Defeat Husband’s Suit for Restitution of Conjugal Rights.
10 Jul 2018The dispute arose from a Muslim marriage solemnized on 03.05.2014. The husband filed a petition under Section 281(1) of Mohomedan Law for restitution ...
