Search Results for "assessment pending"

2507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Income-tax Act as Time-Barred -- Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 Held Invalid Due to Limitation Under Sections 148, 149, 153A, and 153C

The High Court of Gujarat allowed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Orders Quashed and Remanded for Fresh Hearing Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Siemens Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed multiple writ petitions challenging assessment orders pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withholding Tax on Firm Function Services Paid to Non-Resident US Company. Payments for Central Administrative Support Services Held Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under Indo-US Tax Treaty.

The petitioner, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (United States), a non-resident company incorporated under US laws, is part of the McKinsey Group providing i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...