Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd., a public limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 30 November 2015. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80HH on Gross Profits Without Deducting Depreciation and Investment Allowance. The Court Overruled Motilal Pesticides and Held That Section 80HH Deduction Is Computed on 'Profits and Gains' Not 'Income'.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Recall Order on Depreciation of Stock Exchange Membership Card. Court Holds That Reliance on Uncited Precedent Without Hearing Does Not Constitute a Mistake Apparent on Record Under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, M/s Inventure Growth & Securities Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision Allowing Interest Deduction Under Section 36(1)(iii) for Dealer in Shares. Interest on Borrowed Funds for Investment in Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Expenditure, Not to be Reduced from Dividend Income Under Section 57(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appella...