Search Results for "alienation without consideration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "alienation without consideration"

714 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 714 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Modifies Decree to Include Right of Residence for Defendant. Court holds that a co-owner in possession cannot be ousted without partition by metes and bounds, and that the trial court erred in granting a preliminary decree without considering the defendant's right of residence under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

9 Jun 2026

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 passed by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, in O.S.No.65 of 2009, a suit for partit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

28 Mar 2014

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Sets Aside Mesne Profits Award. Co-owner in possession not liable for mesne profits without proof of ouster.

9 Jun 2026

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 in O.S.No.65 of 2009 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul. The plaintiff...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Sale Deed Cancelled to Extent of Plaintiff's 1/4th Share as Purchaser Not a Bonafide Transferee Without Notice.

4 Dec 2021

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.4, Vikrant s/o Vilasrao Patil (since deceased, through legal heirs), challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Karta's Authority to Sell Joint Hindu Family Property Upheld. The Court held that a Karta can execute an agreement to sell joint family property without consent of other coparceners if supported by legal necessity, and the absence of their signatures does not invalidate the transaction.

12 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Beereddy Dasaratharami Reddy against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had dismissed his su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Arbitration Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Claim for Injunction Against Alienation of Partnership Property. Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC allowed as it did not change nature of proceedings and was necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

25 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his applications for amendment (Exh.35 and Exh.36) in a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

FIRST APPEAL NO.514 OF 2014

16 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a suit dismissed by the trial court for mandatory injunction seeking execution of an agreement for sale of a flat under the Maha...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision, Rejects Plaint in Specific Performance Suit Involving New Tenure Land. Agreement to Sell New Tenure Land Without Collector's Permission is Void Under Section 43 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, and Suit Based on Such Agreement is Barred by Law.

3 Mar 2026

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Dilipbhai Parshottambhai Patel and others) against an order of the le...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)