Search Results for "accomplice evidence"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor — Life Sentence Confirmed. Court holds that minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not undermine credibility when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt complaint.

The appellant-accused, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, was convicted by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 376, 341, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment of the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No.33 of 1996, convicting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Counterfeit Currency Possession and Use Under IPC Sections 489(B) and 489(C) — Accused's Possession of Fake Notes and Attempt to Use Them Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Noor Islam s/o Sadik Ali, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-5, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.83/2012 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Holds Accused Cannot Cross-Examine Approver at Pre-Committal Stage Under Section 306(4) CrPC. The right to cross-examine the approver arises only after committal to the Court of Sessions, as the examination under Section 306(4) is for committal purposes only.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which allowed the respondents (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration Led to Benefit of Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 10/08/2000 passed by the learned Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 31 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Son, and Brother-in-Law for Murder by Throttling. Eyewitness Account of Minor Daughter Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellants, Arvind Ananda Bandal (husband of the deceased), Bajirao Arvind Bandal (son), and Hanmant Ananda Bandal (brother of Arvind), were convi...