Search Results for "Unregistered partnership firm"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Demolition Notice Case. Court holds that demolition notices under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 require prior show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, upholding trial court's order setting aside notices.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (appellant) filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which set aside demolition n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Interim Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Smt. Venkamma Namasivayam, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. No substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC as findings are based on evidence and not perverse.

The judgment involves four second appeals arising from a property dispute between Arun s/o Narayanrao Kale (original plaintiff) and the legal represen...