Search Results for "Unauthorised occupant"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider. Negligence of Driver Established, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Madhukar Mengawade, who died in a road accident on 25th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Demolition Order in MMC Act Case — Failure to Issue Notice to Owner and Lack of Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Tenant in Possession Since Prior to 1987 Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Section 351 of MMC Act.

The appellant, a tenant in possession of premises since prior to 1987, challenged a show cause notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Tenant for Subletting and Unauthorised Assignment. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 106 Notice Upheld as Valid.

The case involves a dispute over eviction of a tenant from premises in Mumbai. The original landlord, Mr. N.V. Baliga, owned a building at 257, Frere ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Finds Concurrent Findings Not Perverse. The Court held that the compromise decree in earlier suit operated as res judicata and that the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants-appellants against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Solapur, confirming the de...