Search Results for "Section 33(4)"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of 8-Year-Old Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded for the rape of an 8-year-old girl unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Penetration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded, for the offence of rape under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Duty Case Due to Statutory Interpretation. Levy Under Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 Not Applicable as Supply Was to Licensee, Not Consumer as Defined Under Sections 2(b) and 2(ee).

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Patna High Court dated 18 September 2017, which declined to entertain a writ petition filed by the appellant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Security Guard for Sexual Assault of Minor Girls Under POCSO Act and IPC — Evidence of Victims Found Credible and Consistent.

The appellant, Janak Bishu Karma, a security guard, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa for multiple offences including sexual ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Capital Gains Case — Section 54F Deduction Computation Clarified. Investment in new asset before due date of filing return qualifies for exemption even if return is filed late.

The appellant, Humayun Suleman Merchant, sold a plot of land in Mumbai on 29th April 1995 for Rs.85,33,250/-, resulting in a long-term capital gain. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...