Search Results for "Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction of Broken Period Interest for Banks Treating Securities as Stock-in-TradeDeduction Allowed as Revenue Expenditure for Banks Holding Securities as Stock-in-Trade

The Supreme Court addressed the treatment of broken period interest for tax purposes. The issue centered on whether broken period interest could be de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Defamation Case — Rejects Application for Production of Mobile Handset as Electronic Evidence. Court holds that Section 391(2) Cr.P.C. cannot be used to compel production of evidence at appellate stage without showing prejudice or tampering.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by Sri G.M. Kumar (petitioner) against Sri Kishan Hegde (respondent) in a defamation matter. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010211662021_1

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Landowners in MSRTC Bus Depot Acquisition Relying on Prior Award. Market Value Determined Based on Prior Award in Identical Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involved three land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the landowners claiming enhanced comp...