Search Results for "Section 124-A Railways Act"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Self-Inflicted Injury Not Proved. Deceased was a bonafide passenger; failure to examine witnesses leads to inference of untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the original applicants, Vasanti Parsottam Patel and Mrs. Urvashi Ravi Jugran, challenging the order dated 29 September 2014 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Doctrine Applied. Claimants entitled to compensation as deceased was a bona fide passenger holding a valid ticket, rebutting the presumption of negligence under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a claim petition by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in OA No. II U 162/2012 dated 14.12.2016. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Dependency and Notional Income Determined Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and awarded Rs. 3,60,000 compensation to the family of the deceased labourer who died in a train accident.

The case involves a first appeal filed by the appellants, who are the widow, children, and parents of the deceased Manoj Pawar, against the dismissal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's fall from running train held to be an untoward incident, reversing Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation.

The case involves an appeal by the widow and son of Gautam Kamble, who died after falling from a running train (No. 57548) at Latur Road Railway Stati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Compensation Claim Due to Affidavit Language Issue. Tribunal Directed to Decide Claim on Merits Considering All Evidence and Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 18 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The appellant, Shilabai wd/o Raghunath Hemne, lost her husband in a railway accident on 04.10.2002. She filed a claim for compensation under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Dependents of Deceased Passenger. Fall from Overcrowded Train Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Administration is Liable for Compensation.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railway Administration) against the judgment and award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Claimant's Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, appealed against the judgment and award dated 21st September 2010 passed by ...