Search Results for "Prosecutrix Testimony"

374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa confirmed conviction of Appellant in Sexual Assault Case Under IPC and Goa Children's Act Due to consistent Evidence and Corroboration

The Appellant was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 341, 354, 375(b), and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Unnatural Offence on 3-Year-Old Girl. Testimony of Minor Victim Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f) and 377 IPC.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from the conviction of Patiram Gangaram Shelokar for the rape and unnatural offence committed on a 3-year-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dadarao Gotiramji Khandare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony lacked corroboration and delay in lodging FIR was not satisfactorily explained.

The appellant, Mansing Nana Shinde, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 376, 323, 506, 343 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Sadashiv Rahate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Khamgaon in Special Atrocity Case No.3/2011 for offences under Sections 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Korde, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Consent and Voluntary Relationship. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Stay and Marriage-Like Relationship with Accused Negates Offences Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Pintukumar @ Jitendrakumar Chedilal Girigosavi, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No....