Search Results for "Pecuniary Advantage"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Ex-Husband's Petition in Execution of Maintenance Decree for Muslim Divorced Wife. Court Emphasizes Expeditious Execution of Maintenance Decrees and Lamented Two-Decade Delay.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Ezazur Rehman, the ex-husband, challenging an order on I.A.No.10 passed by the I Additional Principal Famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gopal Ambadas Gawali, a Police Head Constable, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Act Land Transfer Dispute. Petitioner failed to prove that respondent No.4 was not an agriculturist under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Nilesh Ravindra Varode, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Roopchand Motghare, was a peon with Nagpur Municipal Corporation posted at octroi check post No.10, Wadi. On 20/8/2002, Dili...