Search Results for "Notice under Section 32(2)"

393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Recovery Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Petitioner's Pre-Deposit of 7.5% of Disputed Tax Entitles It to Settlement Under KVSS, 1998 Despite Pending Adjudication.

The petitioner, M. Ramzan & Co., a firm engaged in providing works contract services and holding registration under Service Tax Law, was issued a show...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.

The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...