Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act principles"

836 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 836 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case on Territorial Jurisdiction Grounds. Territorial Jurisdiction Objection Overruled as Procedural Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Following Precedent in Malati Sardar v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

The appeal arose from a motor vehicle accident where the appellant's son died after being hit by a tractor driven recklessly by the first respondent. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Driver and Owner. Apportionment of Liability Between Owner and Driver Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Prasad Sarodaya, who died in a road ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Motor Accident — Permanent Disability Assessed at 70% with Multiplier of 18. The court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing disability at 30% and applied correct multiplier and future prospects as per law.

The appellant, Ketaki Milind Kulkarni, a minor aged 8 years at the time of the accident, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Held Liable Despite Driver's Lack of License. Insurer Failed to Prove Willful Breach of Policy Conditions; Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner and Driver.

The appellant, Harish Dhirajlal Bilakhiya, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor vehicl...