Search Results for "Media Rights"

403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court declined to quash FIR in Land Fraud Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 though Civil Nature of Dispute and Complaint by Power of Attorney Holder is sustained

The petitioner, accused No. 8 in a land fraud case, sought quashing of FIR registered under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Media Agency Contract Dispute. Rejects Limitation Objection as Not Ex-Facie Time-Barred, Holding That Limitation Is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law to Be Decided by the Arbitrator.

The applicant, TLG India Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Media Rights. Court Upholds Security Deposit of Rs. 390 Crores Directed by Single Judge to Protect BCCI's Claim Pending Arbitration.

The present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Nimbus Communications Limited (the appellant) against a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Activist's Petition Seeking Income Tax Returns of Public Figure. Holds That Personal Information of Third Party Cannot Be Disclosed Unless Larger Public Interest Is Established Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gandhi, an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Advertisement Expenses Not Subject to Disallowance. Assessee's expenditure on promoting foreign channels held to be for its own business benefit, not requiring compensation from foreign principals.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29th July 2011, which confi...