Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

527 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Rejection of Permanency Claim - Government Resolution for Absorption of Daily Wage Workers Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court directed the Respondent to grant permanency to the Petitioner with effect from 1 June 2012 under the Government Resolution dated 16 October 2012.

5 Jan 2024

The Petitioner, a daily wage worker engaged by the Respondent-Corporation (fully owned by the Forest Department of Maharashtra) since 1999, sought abs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Deposit of Pension — Pension Not Awarded in Earlier Labour Court Order, Recovery Application Cannot Expand Scope

22 Aug 2023

The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation challenged an order of the Industrial Court directing it to deposit pension payable to the respondent from the date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

High Court

High Court Allows Employee's Petition in Misappropriation Case — Reinstatement with Continuity but No Back Wages Upheld. Industrial Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 is Limited and Cannot Interfere with Labour Court's Finding of Disproportionate Punishment.

22 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Ranjit Baburao Awhad, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). He was dismissed from serv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Contractual Watchmen Entitled to Permanent Status After 240 Days of Work. The court held that the employer committed unfair labour practices under Items 6, 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act by failing to confer permanent status on watchmen who completed 240 days of work and by terminating them illegally.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., a statutory body under the Indian Electricity Supply Act, 1948, challenged an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Temporary Appointments Cancelled Before Completion of 240 Days Service. Industrial Court's finding that petitioners did not complete 240 days of continuous service under MRTU & PULP Act upheld.

8 Jan 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees against the Wardha District Cooperative Agricultural, Rural and Multipurpose Development B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice for Non-Observance of Rule 81 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 and Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Custom and Practice of Negotiation with Union Constitutes Condition of Service. The court held that the established custom of negotiation with the union was a condition of service, and its breach, along with non-compliance with the 'last come first go' principle, constituted unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

5 May 2006

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Mackinon Mackenzie Ltd. (the appellant/original respondent in the complaint) against the judgment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Traffic Manager Without Domestic Inquiry and Failure to Prove Abandonment Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Sep 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Universal Transport Co., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that they had committed an un...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)