Search Results for "Land encroachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Land encroachment"

773 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 773 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Encroachment Eviction Order — Plan-Marked Channel in Patta Land is Government Land Under RSO 26(15). The court upheld the concurrent findings of the authorities that the petitioner's construction of a pipeline and wall in a plan-marked channel constituted encroachment on government land, and no interference was warranted in writ jurisdiction.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, V.S. Ponnusamy, owned a land at Nallagoundanpalayam Village, Erode Taluk. A plan-marked channel was running through his patta land. Un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under Slum Act for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) — Acquisition of Petitioner's Land by Deputy Collector Set Aside for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, NESCO Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of its land bearing CT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Second Appeal in Part, Remands for Demarcation of Encroached Land. Dispute over ownership and encroachment of land survey no. 34/1 at Jaswantpura, Aurangabad, with conflicting claims between plaintiffs and CIDCO.

31 Jan 2022

The case involves two second appeals by the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a common judgment of the appellate court. The ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Encroachment Suit — Remand Order Set Aside for Exceeding Appellate Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. The First Appellate Court's order reversing trial court's dismissal and remanding for fresh trial was held to be without jurisdiction as the suit was not disposed of on a preliminary point.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for removal of encroachment and possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands Case for Fresh Measurement by Court Commissioner. Courts below erred in discarding survey evidence and rejecting application for appointment of Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC.

22 Feb 2018

The appellant, Tulsabai, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit for possession after removing encroachment allegedly committed by the respondents...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Possession and Removal of Obstruction. Earlier Suit Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit if Cause of Action is Different.

10 Mar 2015

The revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 against the order of the Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gangapur, dismissing his ...

High Court

High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Case — Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Material Evidence. Findings of Appellate Court vitiated for overlooking trial court's consideration of government measurement report and boundary marks.

4 Feb 2014

The appellant, Sau. Rukhmabai, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the Appellate Court which reversed the trial court's decree in her favor....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land to Third Party in IT Park — No Legitimate Expectation or Right to Specific Performance of MOU for Land Allotment. The court held that the MOU was not a concluded contract and the petitioners' remedy lay in civil court, not writ jurisdiction.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Patni Computers Systems Ltd and its director Sitaram R. Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Alternate Plot — No Legal Right to Substitution Established. Co-operative society's claim for alternate land rejected as original allotment remained intact, no statutory right under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

5 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Nyaya Darshan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its member Chandru Tolani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Encroachment and Title. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

4 Mar 2005

The case involves two cross suits between Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde (appellant) and Anna Bhau Lone (respondent) concerning a property admeasuri...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)