Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003"

232 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Gain on Pre-payment of Deferred VAT/Sales Tax Held as Revenue Receipt. The court held that the benefit arising from prepayment of deferred sales tax liability at a discounted NPV is a revenue receipt taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it represents a remission or cessation of a trading liability.

5 Feb 2020

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Entry Tax on Unmanufactured Tobacco Under KTEG Act. Notification Inserting 'Unmanufactured Tobacco in Sealed Container' Upheld as Clarificatory Amendment Within 'Tobacco Products of All Description' and Not Requiring Presidential Sanction Under Article 304(b) as per Jindal Stainless Ltd.

22 Oct 2019

The writ petitions challenged Notification-III No.FD 208 CSL 2013 dated 1.10.2013 issued by the Government of Karnataka, which amended the earlier Not...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of Karnataka Sales Tax Rules — Condition of 'Same Form' for Deduction in Works Contracts Not Ultra Vires Section 5B of KST Act. Rule 6(4)(m)(i) read with Explanation III is a deduction provision and does not expand the charging section; it is constitutionally valid.

2 Jul 2019

The appellant, M/s Craft Interiors (P) Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in interior decoration. It purchased goods like timber, plaster of p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Education and Service Matters — Multiple Petitioners Seek Relief Related to Education and Service Disputes. No specific legal finding extractable as judgment text is limited to the cause title and party list without any substantive content.

21 Dec 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in KVAT Penalty Case — Minor Discrepancy Between e-Sugam and Invoice Not Sufficient for Penalty. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside penalty under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, accepting the assessee's explanation that the discrepancy was due to pre-final invoice feeding.

14 Jun 2018

The State of Karnataka filed a revision petition under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against the order of the Ka...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

18 Jun 2015

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not Exigible to Tax Under Entry 82 of Schedule IV of KVAT Act, 2003. The court held that the product, being a mixture of dehydrated potato flakes and vegetables, does not fall under the specific taxing entry and is not exigible to tax.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.40521/2010 dated 10.02.2011. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Notional Loss Claim on Securities Reclassification. Tribunal's order allowing deduction of notional loss on transfer of securities from 'Available for Sale' to 'Held to Maturity' based on RBI guidelines upheld.

10 Jul 2014

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-2 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 15 July 2011. The I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)