CMA(PT).No.46 of 2024
18 Mar 2025Background: This is an appeal filed under Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970 by the applicant against the order of the Controller of Patents rejec...
Search Results for "Intellectual Property"
281 result(s) found
Found 281 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Dispute to Arbitration in Asset Purchase and License Agreement Case — Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Ordered Despite Assignment Dispute. The court held that at the Section 11 stage, it need only examine existence of an arbitration agreement, not the merits of assignment, under Section 11(6-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Nov 2024The petitioner, Lifeforce Cryobank Sciences Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of the United States of America, filed an arbitration petition...
- 510
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Dispute Over 'Anna' for South Indian Eateries - Prior User Fails to Establish Infringement Due to Generic Nature of Mark. The court held that the word 'Anna' is generic and cannot be exclusively appropriated, rejecting the claim of trademark infringement and passing off under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
30 Nov 2023The dispute arose between two eatery owners in Pune over the use of the word 'Anna' in their restaurant names. The Appellant-Plaintiff, Shantapa alias...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.
19 Sep 2022The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by USV Pvt Ltd in Disparagement Cases, Upholds Injunction Against Comparative Advertising. The court held that disparaging a rival's product by implying it contains harmful ingredients without scientific basis constitutes unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
13 Jul 2022The case involves two appeals filed by USV Private Limited (USVPL) against a common order dated 16th June 2022 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay ...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in Criminal Proceedings Due to Lack of Reasons and Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. The Court Held That Blanket 'No Coercive Measures' Orders Without Conditions and Reasons Are Impermissible Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 226 of the Constitution, as They Hamper Investigation and Bypass Anticipatory Bail Provisions.
13 Apr 2021The dispute arose from an interim order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a writ petition fil...
- 503
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in University Software Contract Dispute. Parties jointly request retired judge as arbitrator; Court appoints subject to Section 12 declarations and Fourth Schedule fees.
9 Jul 2019The petitioner, Nirmal Software Services Pvt. Ltd., entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University...
- 280
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes State Information Commission Order for Violation of Natural Justice in RTI Matter — Third Party Not Heard Before Disclosure of Confidential Information Under Section 19(4) of Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court held that the Commission must give notice and hearing to a third party before directing disclosure of information related to that party.
14 Nov 2014The petitioner, Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State Information Commission, Nagpur Bench, which...
- 39
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.
1 Apr 2013The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.
29 Apr 2011The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...
- 88
