Search Results for "GST payment"

259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund in GST Case Based on Department's Affidavit Acknowledging Eligibility — Interest Not Payable Under Amended Section 50(3) of CGST Act, 2017. Petitioner's credit balance never fell below wrongly availed amount, so no interest was due.

The petitioner, Soorajmull Bajinath Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 August 2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Supply of Micronutrient Supplements Due to Arbitrary Evaluation. Court Sets Aside Rejection of Technical Bid and Directs Re-evaluation with Transparency.

The petitioner, M/s. Pharmaveda (I) Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of specialty food products including dietetic foods, challenged its disqualification in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Confiscation Order Under Section 130 of CGST Act for Lack of Mens Rea — Petitioner's Goods and Conveyance Seized During Inter-State Transport, Order Set Aside as Proceedings Under Section 130 Require Intent to Evade Tax, Not Mere Technical Irregularity.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Pampapathy Enterprises, a proprietorship firm represented by its proprietor Sri Imamahusen Majaresab Mannanavar, was transp...