Search Results for "Evidence Closed"

3385 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3385 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence Under Section 366 CrPC and Criminal Appeal Against Conviction. The Trial Court Convicted the Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 323 Indian Penal Code and Awarded Death Sentence.

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as a confirmation reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Death Sentence Confirmation in Wife-Murder and Dowry Harassment Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 498A, 506/34 IPC Challenged by Accused Husband and In-Laws; Allegations of Dowry Demand and Murder by Throat-Slitting.

These matters arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No. 182 of 2014, where accused No. 1, Nitin Balkisan Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Whether Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Can Give Evidence by Affidavit. Court Considers Application for Quashing of Proceeding Permitting Accused's Affidavit and Rejection of Section 311 Cr.P.C. Application.

The petitioner, as complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sought quashing of the proceeding...