Search Results for "Disciplinary proceeding"

1111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail and Acquitting Accused, Holding That Wrong Orders Alone Do Not Constitute Misconduct. Disciplinary Action Requires Proof of Extraneous Considerations or Corrupt Motive, Not Mere Errors of Judgment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judicial officer, Krishna Prasad Verma, against the State of B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Punishment Order in Service Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Reduction in Pension by Three Stages for 10 Years Held Disproportionate for Alleged Bribery of Rs.250-300.

The petitioner, R. Vasu, was appointed as an Office Assistant in the Tamil Nadu Revenue Department on 03.05.1986 and later promoted to Junior Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State's Appeal, Upholds Quashing of Compulsory Retirement of Tahsildar; Official Acted on Superior Officers' Written Instructions, Not Guilty of Misconduct.

The intra-court appeal arose from a writ petition where a single judge of the Madras High Court set aside the punishment of compulsory retirement impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Head Master's Petition for Pension and Benefits Despite Post-Retirement Disciplinary Inquiry. Disciplinary Inquiry Initiated After Superannuation Without Statutory Authority is Invalid and Pension Cannot Be Withheld.

The petitioner, Ashok Ramrao Kadam, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 9 August 1984 and later promoted as Head Master. He served until his supe...