Search Results for "Co-accused"

278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Office Bearers of Ayyappa Samajam for Alleged Violation of Consent Terms. Court holds that contempt proceedings are not maintainable against persons who are not parties to the consent terms and that the remedy lies in execution proceedings.

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, office bearers of Ayyappa Samajam, Nagpur, violated consent terms recorded in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge Application in Dowry Death Case. Dying Declaration and Presumption Under Section 113-B of Evidence Act Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Appasaheb @ Eknath Nago Salunke, the husband of the deceased Kirti, challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC — Confirms Three-Year Rigorous Imprisonment and Compensation of Rs.70,000. Revision Petition Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law on Cruelty and Demand for Dowry Are Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.

The revision petitioner, Babanrao Dnyandoba Shinde, was the husband of the informant Suvarna Shinde. Their marriage was solemnized in 1993. The wife a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradict Each Other and Lack Corroboration.

The appellants, Masoodali Sadaikali and his father Sadikali Asadali, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Railway Property Act Case Due to Lack of Maintainability. State of Maharashtra cannot appeal acquittal under Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 as only the Central Government or complainant can file such appeal.

The respondent, Nizamuddin Kutubuddin Ansari, was prosecuted along with four others under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Placement of Vital Bail Order. The court held that failure to place the detailed bail order before the Detaining Authority vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, Shobha Dattatray Bodake, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...