Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

30 Apr 2026

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute Over Related Person Status. The court held that sales between subsidiaries of a common holding company do not constitute transactions with a 'related person' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no mutual interest in each other's business, applying the arm's length principle.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning the valuation of excisable goods under th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute Over Footwear Sales to Military Institutions. Bulk Sales to Institutional Consumers Do Not Qualify as Retail Sales Under Section 4(A) of Central Excise Act, 1944, Making Manufacturer Ineligible for Tax Benefits Under Notification No. 12/2012-CE.

21 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a CESTAT order that had granted tax benefits to a footwear manufacturer under Notification No. 12/2012-CE read...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Dredger Components. Imported goods like pumping units and pipes are held as integral parts of a cutter suction dredger, entitling them to nil duty under Notification No. 21/2002-CUS, based on functionality and precedent in Boskalis Dredging India Pvt. Ltd.

1 Mar 2023

The dispute involved an appellant who imported a cutter suction dredger along with accessories such as pumping units, pipes, air compressors, and othe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Advance Licence Case — Duty Exemption Denied for Failure to Fulfill Export Obligation. The court held that the respondent-assessee failed to produce evidence of actual use of imported Lauryl Alcohol in the manufacture of export goods, and the extended period of limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 was rightly invoked due to suppression of facts.

6 Jan 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (EP) against a common order dated 24 July 2006 of the Customs Excise and Service Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Service Tax Demand and Section 35F Validity — Petitioner Relegated to Alternate Remedy of Appeal. Constitutional challenge to Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 not entertained as validity already upheld; factual disputes remitted to appellate authority.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Tyresoles India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 October 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Exci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case — Notification 8/2005-ST Held Conditional. CESTAT order setting aside demand against assessee upheld as notification required fulfillment of conditions for exemption.

1 Apr 2015

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-II, filed appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging a common order dated 12...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty for Offences Relating to Excisable Goods.

14 Sep 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal against the order dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case, Upholds MODVAT Credit for Purification and Filtration of Acids. Processes of purification and filtration of Hydrochloric Acid and Sulphuric Acid, though not causing chemical change, amount to manufacture under Central Excise Act, 1944 as they are incidental and ancillary to making the product marketable.

24 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom, Thane-I, appealed against the order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)