Search Results for "widow adoption"

156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeals in Property Suit — Decree of Trial Court Set Aside for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Held Not Maintainable Without Impleading All Co-Sharers Under Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Will Execution Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in Regular Civil Appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit — Petitioner's Right to be Heard as Necessary Party Upheld Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Dattatraya S/o Laxman Anandkar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Shrigonda, dated 30/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute — Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Tenancy Issue Despite Pleadings. The Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 being a welfare legislation, no contract can waive a tenant's rights, and courts must consider its provisions.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa arising from a dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Dated 1st October 1974 Proved; Appellant as Subsequent Purchaser Not Protected Under Section 19(b) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sadashiv Ramchandra Arve (original defendant no.3) against the judgment and decree dated 2nd December 1992 ...