Search Results for "trade union recognition"

361 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 361 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Bajaj Electricals Ltd, Upholds Closure of Diecasting Division as Genuine. Industrial Court's finding of functional integrality between diecasting and fan divisions reversed; closure held valid under Section 25O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Bajaj Electricals Limited, had a factory at Chakan, Pune, comprising two divisions: a diecasting division and a fan division. The diec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Educational Society Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Part-Time Peon. Industrial Court's finding that the employee was performing full-time duties and was entitled to permanency under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 upheld.

The petitioner, Ahmednagar Education Society, challenged an order of the Industrial Court at Ahmednagar dated 18.8.1994, which allowed the complaint f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Closure of Shipping Company Office. Labour Court's Finding of Genuine Closure Upheld; No Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 1(b) and 1(d) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Lionel Edward & India Steamship Employees Union challenging the dismissal of their complaint of unfair labo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Challenging Industrial Court Order Directing Promotion of Qualified Employees with Retrospective Effect. Promotion of Unqualified Employee Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Rama Khobragade, an employee of the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board, challenged an order dated 14.07.1995 passed by the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Order on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. The court held that an order refusing to try maintainability as a preliminary issue is not a final order and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

The petitioners, Dattaram Panchal and others, filed a complaint before the Labour Court at Mumbai alleging that the first respondent, M/s. Nirlon Limi...