Search Results for "tax evasion"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Confiscation Notice Due to Improper Procedure. Authorities Must Complete Entire Process Under Section 129 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Before Invoking Confiscation Under Section 130, Unless Intention to Evade Tax is Established.

The dispute arose from the detention of a truck transporting metal scrap by the State Tax Officer on November 22, 2023, under Section 129 of the Centr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders set aside as show cause notices and assessment orders were uploaded on GST portal without proper communication to petitioners, violating principles of natural justice.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...