WRIT PETITION NO. 4021 OF 2024N
16 Apr 2025The writ petition arose from a dispute over an agreement to sale dated 18/01/2022 between M/s. Radha Madhav Developers, a partnership firm, and the re...
Search Results for "suit infructuous"
405 result(s) found
Found 405 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of oral agreement to transfer shares, finding no valid contract and no limitation bar.
13 Sep 2023The petitioner, Vijay Shivram Pathare, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30 ...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.
27 Sep 2022The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
30 Jul 2018The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...
- 219
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.
2 Aug 2017The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal as Infructuous in Nagpur Improvement Trust Demolition Case. Suit Challenging Demolition Notice Becomes Infructuous After Rejection of Regularization Application by Subsequent Memo.
28 Jul 2016The case involves a second appeal filed by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (appellants) against the judgment in Regular Civil Suit No. 571 of 2002. The o...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Notices Against Defendant in Patent Infringement Suit — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that breach of an order must be willful and deliberate to constitute contempt under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and mere technical or inadvertent violations do not attract punishment.
28 Jun 2016The Plaintiff, CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement suit against Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Lt...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, leading to dismissal of the suit.
10 Sep 2015The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, in O.S. No. 82/2010, wh...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favour Plaintiff. Agreement to Sell and Earnest Money Payment Established, Injunction Necessary to Prevent Alienation Pending Suit.
14 Aug 2015The appellant/defendant, Harish Bulchand Tejwani, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Akola, in Special ...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Eviction Case Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Licensee's Forcible Re-entry After Lawful Eviction Does Not Entitle Him to Restoration. Competent Authority Has No Jurisdiction to Restore Possession to a Trespasser Under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
23 Dec 2010The petitioner, Ramchandra B. Relwani, was the owner of a flat in Mumbai. In October 2001, he granted a leave and license to the respondent, Raees Ahm...
- 29
