Search Results for "substantial damage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "substantial damage"

909 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 909 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction on Gaothan Land — Upholds Municipal Action Under MRTP Act. Held that construction without valid permission is liable for demolition without prior notice.

29 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Jamshid Kersi Dalal and others, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their building constructed on gaothan land in Pun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

20 Feb 2014

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Governments to Provide Ex Gratia Compensation for Covid-19 Deaths Under Disaster Management Act. The court held that Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 imposes a mandatory obligation to recommend guidelines for ex gratia assistance, and financial constraints cannot override statutory and constitutional duties under Article 21 of the Constitution.

30 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard two writ petitions filed in public interest by Reepak Kansal and Gaurav Kumar Bansal against the Union of India and o...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers interim injunction in passing-off suit over 'iTerm' mark for online insurance policies. Court examines whether 'iTerm' is inherently distinctive or has acquired secondary meaning under common law of passing off, and plaintiff's challenge to defendant's use of 'Aviva i-Term Smart'.

19 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Aegon Life Insurance Company Limited, instituted a suit for passing off against Aviva Life Insurance Company India Limited, seeking an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Comprehensive Measures to Tackle Uninsured Vehicles and Standardise Motor Insurance Policy Terms in Public Interest. Court Calls for Technology-Enabled Enforcement of Section 146 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Mandates Consumer Awareness Initiatives

4 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed two substantial issues arising in a civil appeal filed by an insurance company: the widespread non-compliance with Section...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)