Search Results for "subsisting tenancy"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Perjury Proceedings in Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of False Evidence Established Under Section 340 CrPC. Court Hears Accused on Preliminary Issue and Finds Allegations Unsubstantiated.

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Satyanarayan Nandk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Mutation Entry Orders in Land Dispute — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to petitioners set aside under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioners, Damodar Vittal Kamath and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...