Search Results for "specific reference"

10142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal, Upholds Specific Performance Decree for Oral Agreement to Sell Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

This second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff (now represented by legal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Sales Tax on Pan Masala and Gutkha in Multiple Appeals. State Legislatures Empowered to Levy Sales Tax on These Goods Despite Central Excise Levies, as They Are Not Declared Goods Under Section 14(ix) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts concerning the taxability of pan masala and gutkha under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Specific Performance Suit — No Right, Title or Interest in Suit Property at Time of Agreement. Subsequent purchaser/developer not entitled to be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as decree would bind them.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a chamber summons filed by M/s Space Developer, a registered partnership firm, seeking impleadment as a party defendan...