Search Results for "slum rehabilitation area"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Authorities to Decide Pending CRZ Clearance Application for SRA Project Within Four Weeks. Delay in Decision on Coastal Regulation Zone Clearance Cannot Be Justified by Pendency of New Coastal Zone Management Plan.

The petitioners, M/s. Mayurpunkh Fine Builders Pvt. Ltd. and others, including a co-operative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Shop Tenants Against BMC and MHADA for Occupation Certificate and Tax Waiver. Developer's Default in Surrendering Area to MHADA Cannot Prejudice Tenants Who Cooperated in Redevelopment.

The petitioners were tenants of shops in a property owned by Mumtaj Begum Shah Mohammed and others, located at Miya Mohamed Chhotani Road, Mahim, Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Resolution Professional's Writ Petition as Abuse of Process in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. The court held that the Resolution Professional's petition was a complete abuse of the process of the court and dismissed it with costs.

The petitioner, Rajan Garg, acting as the Resolution Professional of Truly Creative Developers Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions Challenging MHADA's Cancellation of Police Housing Lease — Allotment Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme at Gaikwad Nagar Questioned

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two connected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the M...