Search Results for "share dealing"

2053 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2053 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Valuation Based on Book Value as Per Partnership Deed. Clause-11 of Partnership Deed Mandates Asset Valuation on Book Value Basis, Not Market Value, Under Section 48 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case involves two appeals filed by Dr. Vijaypat Singhania and others (Appeal No. 361 of 2010) and Dr. Gaur Hari Singhania and others (Appeal No. 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Delivery — Respondent's Opposition on Grounds of Hardship Not Sustained. Court Permits Withdrawal Without Prejudice to Respondent's Rights Under the Award and Pending Proceedings.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of a Single Judge dated 2 February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Pronounces Judgment in Appeal by 9th Defendant Against Decree in Partition and Declaration Suit — Validity of Sale Deeds Executed Without Consent of Co-sharer Questioned

The appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the 9th defendant against the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2020 in O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant Company's Revision Against Jurisdiction Under PSCC Act. Company Failed to Prove Paid-Up Share Capital Below Rs.1 Crore to Avail Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 12) against M/s. New Era Fabrics Ltd., the original de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Interim Application in Partition Suit Over Alleged HUF Properties. Plaintiff Seeks Injunction and Appointment of Court Receiver Pending Suit, Claiming Undivided Share Despite 2001 Affidavit Acknowledging Properties as Self-Acquired.

The present order arises from an Interim Application filed by the plaintiff, Variinder @ Rajan, in Suit No. 343 of 2022 before the High Court of Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court's Part-Decreed Partition Suit. Appeals Challenge Findings on Validity of Wills and Codicils Executed by Parents in Dispute Over Joint Family Properties.

The case involved two regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2...