Search Results for "rebuttable presumption"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction and Fine of Rs.1.80 Crore Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.90 Lakhs Issued Towards Repayment of Loan — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Maxworth Realty India Ltd. and its Chairman & Managing Director K. Kesava) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acquittal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Any Debt or Liability, Leading to Confirmation of Concurrent Sentence of Six Months.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Krishna Gudi, against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proof of Debt and Probable Defence. Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt as Cash Loan Exceeded Income Tax Limit and No Documentary Evidence of Transaction.

The appeal was filed by the complainant (Smt. Shobha and others) against the acquittal of the respondent/accused (Gajanan Joshi) under Section 138 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Petition Against Eviction Decree for Subletting Without Consent. Subletting of Tenanted Premises Without Landlord's Consent Constitutes Unauthorized Transfer Under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original tenant Vatsala Krishna Jadhav, challenged the eviction decree passed against them by the courts...