COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018
18 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "quality testing"
309 result(s) found
Found 309 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights
8 Nov 2024The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...
- 2146
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Plaintiff's 11-Month Delay and Lack of Genuine Urgency Leads to Relegation to Mediation.
6 Sep 2024The plaintiff, Ultra Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit alleging copyright infringement of the character 'Shaktimaan' by the d...
- 606
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG 2024 Exam Integrity, Finds No Systemic Leak or Malpractice. Court dismisses petitions for re-test, holding that isolated irregularities do not warrant cancellation of the entire examination under Article 226 of the Constitution.
2 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India dismissed a batch of petitions seeking cancellation and re-conduct of the NEET-UG 2024 examination, which was held on 5 May...
- 1487
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...
- 355
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Based on Sufficient Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe, Despite Hostile Witnesses, Upholds Trial Court Verdict.
21 Jul 2022The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Training Officer in a Government ITI College, Saundatti, for demanding and accepting a...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Pumping Machinery at MIDC Water Treatment Plant. Court holds that disqualification based on alleged non-submission of required documents was arbitrary and contrary to tender conditions.
20 Dec 2019The petitioner, M/s Yogiraj Powertech Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender process issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) ...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Insecticides Act Case Due to Delay in Filing Complaint Depriving Accused of Right to Second Sample Testing. The court held that the inordinate delay in filing the complaint under Sections 29(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, which deprived the accused of the right under Section 24(3) to have the second sample tested by the Central Insecticides Laboratory, warranted quashing of the proceedings.
10 Apr 2017The applicants, M/s. Rallis India Limited and its factory manager, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue Expenditure Classification for Technical Consultancy and Labour Housing in Income Tax Reference. Payments for feasibility studies and labour welfare held deductible as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.
11 Feb 2016The case pertains to an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue department. The assessee...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.
3 Mar 2015The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...
- 114
