Bombay High Court Resolves Difference on Quantum of Exemplary Costs in Hoarding Dispute — Imposes Rs.15,00,000 Costs for Suppression and Misstatement. Court holds that costs must be proportionate to conduct and commercial gains, balancing deterrence and proportionality under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Chapter XVII Rule 16 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
14 Nov 2024The petitioner, Pawan Advertising, installed hoardings after obtaining permission from the Grampanchayat, but without the required permission from the...





