Search Results for "presumption under POCSO Act"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Conviction in POCSO Act Case -- Appellant's Challenge to Child Sexual Assault Verdict Fails Due to Reliable Victim Testimony and Corroborative Evidence

The Appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Section 376(2)(i), 506 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) and Sections 6 and 10 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Complainant Mother in POCSO Case — Acquittal of Accused Set Aside for Non-Examination of Material Witness. Trial Court's Failure to Summon the Victim's Father, a Key Witness, Rendered the Acquittal Unsustainable Under Section 372 CrPC.

The appellant, Smt. Rajavva, the mother of the victim, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction for Sexual Assault of Deaf and Dumb Minor Set Aside as Medical and Forensic Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Suresh Surwade for offences under Sections 452 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Alone Insufficient Without Victim's Testimony.

The appellant, Imran Shamim Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 923 of 2013 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Cancels Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty and Tampering with Evidence. The court held that the accused's conduct of threatening the victim and her family after being granted bail constituted misuse of liberty, warranting cancellation under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C.

The State of Karnataka, represented by Yagati Police, filed a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking cancellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Conviction under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yogesh Arjun Maral, was convicted by the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for ...