Search Results for "operational creditors"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "operational creditors"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act, Holding That Section 14 Orders Are Administrative and Not Subject to Appeal Under Section 18. The court clarified that the remedy against a Section 14 order lies only by way of writ petition under Article 226/227, and the DRT has no power to review or recall its own Section 14 order.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court dealt with a batch of writ petitions and interim applications challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) unde...

High Court

Delhi High Court Allows Arbitration Against Guarantors Despite Moratorium Under Section 96 of IBC — Moratorium Does Not Extend to Co-Guarantors Not Covered by NCLT Orders. The court held that the moratorium under Section 96 is debt-centric and personal to the debtor, and does not bar proceedings against other co-guarantors.

20 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a finance company, granted channel finance facility to Sterling Motor Company (SMC), a proprietorship of Tarun Kapoor. Tarun Kapoor, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director in Income Tax Recovery — Director Not in Charge During Relevant Period. Section 179(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 requires that the person sought to be made liable must have been in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the company during the relevant period; mere directorship at the time of default is insufficient.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Geeta P. Kamat, challenged an order dated 22 December 2017 passed by the Income Tax Officer under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case Due to Moratorium Under IBC. Payment Delay Caused by Legal Disability Under Section 14 IBC, Designated Committee Directed to Accept Payment and Issue Discharge Certificate Under Finance Act, 2019 Scheme.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from the appellant company's inability to pay a settlement amount of Rs.1,24,28,500/- under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Supreme Court Allows Operational Creditor's Appeal in Insolvency Claim Delay Matter Applying COVID-19 Limitation Extension. The Court held that the period from 15.03.2020 to 14.03.2021 stands excluded in computing limitation for claim filing under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, making the appellant's claim filed before 14.01.2021 timely.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute originated from a contractual relationship between GPR Power Solutions Private Limited (appellant) and Rohit Ferro Tech Limited (corporate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.

2 Apr 2019

The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of CIRP Petition Due to Settlement Agreement - Mediated Settlement Bars Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, a financial creditor, under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against an order da...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)