Search Results for "oath requirement"

750 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 750 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Condition in Housekeeping Contracts. Court holds that condition requiring prior hospital experience for housekeeping work is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mahalsa Services and Cam Industrial Services challenging a tender condition imposed by the State of Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Proximate Link Between Demand and Death.

The appellant, Santosh Bhaskar Derle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, for offences under Sections 304B, 498A, and 323 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Without Section 202 CrPC Inquiry in Complaint Case Against Accused Residing Outside Jurisdiction. Non-compliance with mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC renders issuance of process illegal and matter remanded for fresh inquiry.

The petitioners, who are the wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law of the complainant (respondent No. 2), challenged the order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Land Dispute Case. Life imprisonment confirmed for accused Nos. 1 and 8 under Section 302 read with 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case arises from a land dispute leading to the murder of Ashok Parjane. The trial court convicted accused No. 1 Kundalik and accused No. 8 Dhansin...