Search Results for "new industrial undertaking"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "new industrial undertaking"

1061 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1061 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Challenge to Land Acquisition under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The Appeals Concern the Validity of Acquisition Proceedings for an Industrial Area Based on Clearance Granted by State High Level Committee Before the Enactment of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002.

10 Apr 2026

The matter arose from a batch of writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka against the common order dated 19.11.2012 of a learned Single J...

High Court

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

10 Mar 2025

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Public Sector Undertaking in Industrial Dispute — Res Judicata Bars Re-adjudication of Retirement Age Issue. The Court held that a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is barred when the same issue has been finally decided by the High Court and Supreme Court in earlier proceedings.

11 Apr 2019

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. (FACT), a public sector undertaking, and its trade unions regar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement of Workman. Domestic Inquiry Held Fair and Punishment of Dismissal Upheld as Not Disproportionate Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, challenged the Award dated 8th April 1994 (Part-I) and Award dated 7th Apr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

30 Nov -0001

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeal on the Scope of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Overriding the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in a Pre-Existing Asset Sale Agreement. The AAIFR Ruled That Section 22A Does Not Apply to Pre-Existing Agreements, and the Supreme Court Was to Determine the Correctness.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from orders passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) conce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Forest Development Corporation Case — Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Invalid Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's failure to conduct proper inquiry and denial of opportunity to lead evidence renders termination illegal, warranting reinstatement with back wages.

27 Sep 2011

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM) challenging the orders of the Labour Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Act Section 80-IB(10) Cases – Clause (d) Commercial Area Limit Not Applicable to Projects Approved Before 31 March 2005. Housing Projects Approved Pre-2005 Held Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80-IB(10) Even if Commercial Area Exceeds 5% or 2000 Sq Ft, Per Ratio in CIT v. Brahma Associates.

19 Sep 2014

These two income tax appeals were filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)