Search Results for "mesne profits"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Case — Tenant Ordered to Vacate for Arrears of Rent. Landlord's Suit for Eviction Under Section 12(3)(a) of Gujarat Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Succeeds as Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over 12 Months.

The case involves a revision application under Section 29(2) of the Gujarat Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Rent Act) filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Plaintiff's Omission to Seek Leave for Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance After Earlier Injunction Suit Results in Bar.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) in a Second Appeal, which upheld the concurrent findings of the Trial Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Bank in Possession Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Possession and Mesne Profits. Counterclaim for Specific Performance of Sale Contract Dismissed as Unenforceable Due to Lack of Registered Agreement and Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The case involves a dispute over immovable property, Municipal House No.9 at Ahmedpur, consisting of a godown, three rooms, and open space on a plot o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Second Appeal in Eviction Suit for Bonafide Need of Landlords. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Bonafide Requirement Cannot Be Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Vijay Shrihari Khandar, was a tenant in a part of a house bearing No.31 C.T.S. 2035, Sheet No.8 at Ramtek, owned by the respondents, Sh...