Search Results for "limited review"

3927 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3927 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Review Petition Allowed in Open Court. Court Holds That Life Imprisonment Is the Rule and Death Sentence an Exception, and Mitigating Circumstances Must Be Considered Even in Heinous Crimes.

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by Md. Mannan @ Abdul Mannan, who had been convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.

The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...