Search Results for "lifestyle"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition Under Article 227, Quashes Husband's Interim Maintenance Order Under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act. Able-bodied Qualified Husband Not Entitled to Maintenance from Wife as He Can Maintain Himself.

The petitioner wife challenged an order of the Family Court, Nagpur, dated 17.07.2025, which directed her to pay interim maintenance of Rs.5,000 per m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Minor Children Seeking to Set Aside Family Settlement — Memorandum of Family Settlement Held Binding as a Family Arrangement Under Contract Act and Specific Relief Act

The plaintiffs, four children of Madhupati and Anuradha Singhania (Defendants 1 and 2), filed a suit seeking cancellation of a Memorandum of Family Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Grants Divorce to Wife on Ground of Cruelty Under Section 32(dd) of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 — Unanimous Delegate Finding of Cruelty Upheld. Wife's Allegations of Mental and Physical Cruelty by Husband Proved, Entitling Her to Divorce and Alimony.

The Plaintiff-wife, Zenobia Ghadially, filed Parsi Suit No. 13 of 2009 in the Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court at Bombay seeking divorce from her husband...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...