Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

616 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification After 32 Years Due to Laches and Delay. Petitioner's claim for quashing final notification under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fails as the challenge is highly belated and the land has already been developed and allotted to third parties.

1 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath K., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Landowners Entitled to Retain Excess Land After Repeal of Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. The Court held that since the land had not vested in the State prior to the repeal, the landowners are entitled to retain the excess land under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) against a common order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case: Deposit of Compensation with Reference Court Constitutes Payment Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The Court held that where compensation is deposited with the Reference Court due to ownership disputes, it satisfies the payment requirement and prevents lapse of acquisition.

1 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against a High Court order declaring that the acquisition of land had lapsed unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition for Release of Land from Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over 45 Years. Land Reserved for Garden and Ring Road Since 1958 Deemed Released as Authority Failed to Act Within Six Months of Section 127 Notice.

25 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Rajendra Rameshwardas Gindodiya, owned land Survey No.569/1 admeasuring 2 hectares and 12 ares in Dhule, which was ancestral property....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Inaction of Planning Authority. Reservation Lapses When Planning Authority Fails to Take Steps for Acquisition Within Six Months of Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

3 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Motilal Hirakhanwala, owned lands bearing Survey No. 386 (2.78 H) and Survey No. 389 (1.23 H) within the limits of Jalna Mu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Appellants Not Entitled to Higher Compensation as Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value. Reference Court's Award of Rs. 1,200 per sq.m. for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld due to lack of reliable evidence for enhancement.

30 Nov -0001

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the claimants (appellants) against the judgment of the Reference Court in land acquisition proceedings. The la...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)