Search Results for "key not seized"

443 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 294 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 10th August 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Suresh Narayan Dakhore, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, for the murder of Laxman Ramkrushna Naik and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to the murder of Laik Khan.

The appellants, Arunkumar @ Kallu Rajendraprasad Pande, Ashok @ Guddu Rajendraprasad Pande, and Santosh @ Lallu Rajendraprasad Pande, were convicted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...