Search Results for "joint venture"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "joint venture"

407 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a project named...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) Allowed Despite Bad Debt Claim Under Section 36(1)(vii) Being Time-Barred. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business which become irrecoverable and written off in books of account are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even if the claim under Section 36(1)(vii) fails due to non-compliance with Section 36(2).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

29 Nov 2024

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

23 Aug 2021

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC — Allegations of Mischief, Criminal Intimidation, and Cheatment Found to Be Civil Dispute. Court Held That Where Dispute Is Purely Civil in Nature, Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained and Are an Abuse of Process of Law.

9 Apr 2021

The petitioners, Mrs. G. Chitra Poornima and Mr. Jagadish, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Operator's Challenge to Customs Regulation Requiring Bill of Entry for Export Goods. Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 Held Intra Vires Customs Act, 1962 and Constitutional.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Regulation 5(2) of the Handling o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Bar Under Order 2 Rule 2(3) CPC — Plaintiff Omitted to Sue for Relief in Previous Suit on Same Cause of Action Without Leave. The court held that the cause of action in both suits was identical, arising from the same term-sheet agreement, and the plaintiff's failure to seek specific performance in the earlier suit without leave barred the subsequent suit.

19 Aug 2014

The plaintiff, Govind B. Bajaj, filed Suit No. 186 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court seeking specific performance of a term-sheet agreement for joint d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Alleging FDI Violations in Insurance Sector as Motivated by Personal Interest. Petitioner's failure to disclose material facts and filing of multiple petitions with similar allegations leads to dismissal with costs.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Sambhaji Savakar Jadhav, filed three public interest litigation petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Capital Gains Treatment for Land Sale by Estate Administrator — Assessee Not a Trader in Land. Surplus from sale of inherited land held as capital gain, not business income, under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2012

The case involved a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, challenging the Tribunal's decision th...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)