Search Results for "income share"

1562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...