Search Results for "impleadment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "impleadment"

854 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 854 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Contempt Proceedings — Impleadment of Sitting Judge Not Permissible in Suo Motu Contempt. Filing of Scandalous Application Against Judge Constitutes Fresh Contempt and Professional Misconduct.

20 Apr 2026

The appellant,  an advocate, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court on behalf of his client seeking a CBI inve...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable for Interest from Date of Petition Despite Delayed Impleadment. Interest liability under Section 171 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is compensatory and cannot be denied for pre-impleadment period.

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Jatin Becharbhai Patel, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition (M.A.C.P. No.331 of 1991) before the Motor Acciden...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded in Individual Capacity Without Showing Individual Interest.

4 Feb 2026

The petitioner filed a suit for bare injunction to restrain government officials from interfering with his possession and for a mandatory injunction d...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Impleading Orders in Land Acquisition References — Reference Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Allowing Impleading Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Without Adjudicating Title. The Court Held That the Land Acquisition Act is a Complete Code and Third Parties Must Establish Title Before a Civil Court.

20 Dec 2024

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, presided over by Justice, delivered a common judgment on 20 December 2024 in three connected writ petitions...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleadment of Stranger to Agreement of Sale as Co-Defendant in Suit for Specific Performance — Stranger Claiming Independent Title or Possession Has Right to Defend Property. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC permits impleadment of a person claiming independent right over suit property to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

15 Oct 2019

The petitioners, who were the plaintiffs in O.S.No.98/2016, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the respondents. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

31 Aug 2018

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Third Parties in Specific Performance Suit Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Co-owners and Signatories to Development Agreement and Partition Deed Held Necessary for Effectual Adjudication.

15 Sep 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Divya Builders, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Impleadment Order in Suit for Declaration of Title, Holding Agreement Purchaser Under Plaintiff Neither Necessary Nor Proper Party. Court Reiterates That Plaintiff as Dominus Litis Cannot Be Compelled to Add a Stranger Against His Wishes Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioner, a company, purchased property from the legal representatives of one Kishanlal Jaiswal. The property originally belonged to Hanumantrao...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Property Dispute — Held That LLP Has No Locus Standi to Seek Impleadment Under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court set aside the Joint Charity Commissioner's order allowing impleadment of individuals claiming to be trustees in proceedings under Section 41A, as the LLP was not a party entitled to be heard.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by Bagasarwala Property LLP challenging an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, dated 15 October 2...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)