Search Results for "gratuity recovery"

268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Removed Teacher Under Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Distinction Between Removal and Dismissal Determines Eligibility for Compassionate Pension.

The petitioner, Nalini Shende, was appointed as a temporary teacher at Smt. Jankidevi Jaiswal Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nagpur, and was granted permanency f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MAT Order and Restores Permanent Withholding of Pension and Gratuity for Misappropriation of Government Grain. Misconduct of Rs.12.41 Lakh Misappropriation Held Gravely Negligent Justifying Penalty Under Rule 27 of MCS (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The dispute arose from the permanent withholding of pension and gratuity of Bhaskar Shankar Salvi, a former Godown Keeper at Ratnagiri, following a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Zilla Parishad to Pay Retired Employee Gratuity and Commutation Amount with Interest for Delayed Payment. Non-payment of retiral benefits after superannuation violates Article 300A of the Constitution and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Motilal s/o Babulal More, retired from the services of the Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar on 31st May 2013 upon attaining the age of supera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practice Orders — Industrial Court's Findings Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer Denied Salary and Benefits to Employees During Strike Period, Constituting Unfair Labour Practices Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

The petitioners, National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and its General Manager, challenged two orders of the Industrial Court at Bo...